←back to thread

277 points nharada | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.96s | source
Show context
mmmlinux ◴[] No.45902647[source]
I was in SF a few weekend ago and rode both Waymo and normal Lyft style taxi cars. the Waymo was a better experience in every single way. One of the Lyfts i was in drove on the shoulder for a while like it was a lane. The Waymos were just smooth consistent driving. No aggressive driving to get you dumped off so they can get to the next fair.
replies(11): >>45902760 #>>45902967 #>>45902998 #>>45903093 #>>45903449 #>>45904903 #>>45904913 #>>45905127 #>>45905613 #>>45906080 #>>45906696 #
proee ◴[] No.45905613[source]
So it might come down to how many "9s" you're comfortable with. The experience is really good 99.999% of the time until it's not, and that "not" could be catastrophic. I suppose the data engineers are quite confident in the 9s.
replies(4): >>45905772 #>>45905820 #>>45905977 #>>45906200 #
1. AceJohnny2 ◴[] No.45905820[source]
> and that "not" could be catastrophic

Any different than with a human taxi driver?

It's not about absolute reliability, it's about how well it compares to the alternative, which is human taxi drivers. And the thing is, you don't hear about human car accidents because it's so common that it's not worth making the news.

replies(1): >>45905843 #
2. AceJohnny2 ◴[] No.45905843[source]
> you don't hear about human car accidents because it's so common that it's not worth making the news.

Another very interesting thing about robotaxis is agency and blame. Taxi driver had an accident? Just that driver is suspect. Robotaxi had an accident? They're all suspect.

replies(1): >>45908080 #
3. hn8726 ◴[] No.45908080[source]
I mean it does make sense though - robo taxis (of one company) are much more homogeneous than any two human drivers could ever be.