←back to thread

460 points andrewl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Amorymeltzer ◴[] No.45903482[source]
Some interesting complications with rounding I had not heard about before were mentioned here, worth noting I think, especially given the prominence of SNAP in the news lately:

>Four states - Delaware, Connecticut, Michigan and Oregon - as well as numerous cities, including New York, Philadelphia, Miami and Washington, DC, require merchants to provide exact change, according to the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS).

>In addition, the law covering the federal food assistance program known as SNAP requires that recipients not be charged more than other customers. Since SNAP recipients use a debit card that’s charged the precise amount, if merchants round down prices for cash purchases, they could be opening themselves to legal problems and fines, said Jeff Lenard, spokesperson for NACS.

>“Rounding down on all transactions presents several challenges beyond the loss of an average of 2 cents per transaction,” Lenard said. “We desperately need legislation that allows rounding so retailers can make change for these customers.”

replies(6): >>45903640 #>>45903663 #>>45903907 #>>45904222 #>>45906009 #>>45907738 #
phantom784 ◴[] No.45903640[source]
For the SNAP law, could they just round down SNAP purchases in the same way to be compliant?
replies(2): >>45903681 #>>45904144 #
anticorporate ◴[] No.45904144[source]
The SNAP equal treatment rule requirement works in both directions: Prices cannot be higher or lower for SNAP recipients. As a retailer, there is an option to request a waiver, though.
replies(3): >>45904221 #>>45904364 #>>45906968 #
jkaplowitz ◴[] No.45904364[source]
So, that sounds like a yes, they could round up or down SNAP purchases just like cash purchases.
replies(1): >>45904570 #
Uvix ◴[] No.45904570[source]
No, because they'd still be paying less/more than people paying with credit cards, debit cards, or checks.
replies(3): >>45905154 #>>45905513 #>>45907203 #
1. ◴[] No.45905513{3}[source]