←back to thread

798 points bertman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
embedding-shape ◴[] No.45900337[source]
Seems its already in Arch's repositories, and seems to work, just add another flag to the invocation:

    yt-dlp --cookies-from-browser firefox --remote-components ejs:github -f "bestvideo[ext=mp4]+bestaudio[ext=m4a]/best[ext=mp4]/best" 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXX'
It is downloading a solver at runtime, took maybe half a second in total, downloads are starting way faster than before it seems to me.

    [youtube] [jsc:deno] Solving JS challenges using deno
    [youtube] [jsc:deno] Downloading challenge solver lib script from  https://github.com/yt-dlp/ejs/releases/download/0.3.1/yt.solver.lib.min.js
It would be great if we could download the solver manually with a separate command, before running the download command, as I'm probably not alone in running yt-dlp in a restricted environment, and being able to package it up together with the solver before runtime would let me avoid lessening the restrictions for that environment. Not a huge issue though, happy in general the start of downloads seems much faster now.
replies(8): >>45900780 #>>45901047 #>>45901146 #>>45901292 #>>45902245 #>>45902494 #>>45903312 #>>45906436 #
WD-42 ◴[] No.45901047[source]
Glad to hear it’s faster now!

YouTube barely works in a full-on browser these days, props to the team that keeps it accessible via a Python script!

replies(6): >>45901546 #>>45901717 #>>45901739 #>>45902053 #>>45902158 #>>45903145 #
recursive ◴[] No.45901739[source]
I use YouTube on a daily basis. I haven't seen any of these problems.
replies(8): >>45902304 #>>45902798 #>>45903326 #>>45903405 #>>45903763 #>>45904977 #>>45905212 #>>45908012 #
PuercoPop ◴[] No.45903763[source]
It is likely you use Chrome or a browser that uses Blink for its engine and the OP uses a non-blink browser like Firefox. I use Firefox and I can cofirm since the last few months Youtube usability borders on usable
replies(8): >>45903856 #>>45903878 #>>45904585 #>>45905055 #>>45906105 #>>45907132 #>>45907311 #>>45907992 #
1. rubyn00bie ◴[] No.45905055{3}[source]
Yeah, big same here. It’s pretty frustrating, because I pay for YouTube premium, but cannot use my preferred browser. I have to use Chromium in order to have it work reliably. Doubly so considering it worked fine in Firefox for YEARS… until maybe six months ago?

It feels like something the FTC should be investigating, or perhaps a European equivalent, but I doubt it will.