Project Euler

Nobody is interested in AI commentary.

I've personally found the opposite. In order to advance you need to know the specific techniques or mathematics and there are no hints or information on how to approach the problem. So it boils down to how much of that mathematics you know. If you don't then the brute force approaches take a long time to find the solution.

I think with a few math tricks you can solve around 25-50, It gets very tough after that without maths background.

Completely agree! Google + Project Euler was how I learned to code

I disagree.

Often the techniques that you need for a harder problem, are discussed in a forum for an easier problem. Even more often the techniques that you need for a given problem are possible to work out from scratch. And the more you work out, the easier they get.

This can be very frustrating for people who are used to being spoon fed techniques, then given problems which use what they have just been taught. But it is a lot of fun for people who enjoy puzzles. If it isn't your cup of tea, that's fine. But don't dismiss it for people who enjoy it.

Disclaimer. I haven't personally engaged in the last few years, but I've spent a lot of time on it. I solved 598 and contributed a couple of puzzles as well. One of which they immediately saw a way to do that I hadn't, and put it out there with a difficulty level that I didn't know how to do! That was https://projecteuler.net/problem=240.

Yeah. I think I got to around 10-15 before I got stuck. It's been several years since I attempted it though.

That seems incorrect. This sub-thread is the longest already in this submission, and no other commenter remarked about the parent commenter being an AI.