←back to thread

199 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
nerdjon ◴[] No.45900968[source]
This screams just as genuine as Google saying anything about Privacy.

Both companies are clearly wrong here. There is a small part of me that kinda wants openai to loose this, just so maybe it will be a wake up call to people putting in way too personal of information into these services? Am I too hopeful here that people will learn anything...

Fundamentally I agree with what they are saying though, just don't find it genuine in the slightest coming from them.

replies(3): >>45901106 #>>45902797 #>>45902969 #
stevarino ◴[] No.45901106[source]
Its clearly propaganda. "Your data belongs to you." I'm sure the ToS says otherwise, as OpenAI likely owns and utilizes this data. Yes, they say they are working on end-to-end encryption (whatever that means when they control one end), but that is just a proposal at this point.

Also their framing of the NYT intent makes me strongly distrust anything they say. Sit down with a third party interviewer who asks challenging questions, and I'll pay attention.

replies(2): >>45901325 #>>45901357 #
preinheimer ◴[] No.45901357[source]
"Your data belongs to you" but we can take any of your data we can find and use it for free for ever, without crediting you, notifying you, or giving you any way of having it removed.
replies(3): >>45901680 #>>45902194 #>>45902764 #
1. bigyabai ◴[] No.45902764[source]
Wow it's almost like privately-managed security is a joke that just turns into de-facto surveillance at-scale.