←back to thread

334 points andrewl | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.307s | source
Show context
Analemma_ ◴[] No.45902070[source]
Honestly nickels and dimes, and maybe even quarters, should go too. It's ridiculous that we don't have $1 and $2 coins in widespread circulation in the US (we have a $1 coin but nobody uses it).
replies(8): >>45902164 #>>45902226 #>>45902303 #>>45902335 #>>45902394 #>>45902682 #>>45903511 #>>45903582 #
delecti ◴[] No.45902394[source]
Quarters might be premature, but the half-cent was discontinued when it was worth a (modern equivalent) of $0.12-17. Even 20-30 years ago, when I was just starting to interact with money enough to have an opinion, I thought it was a hassle to deal with anything smaller than a quarter. The same logic behind getting rid of pennies (they cost more to make than the face value) also supports doing at least nickels.
replies(1): >>45902562 #
1. JohnFen ◴[] No.45902562[source]
> The same logic behind getting rid of pennies (they cost more to make than the face value)

I've honestly never understood why this is a valid reason to object to the coin. Coins aren't used only once, so that they cost most to make than their face value doesn't seem very important, unless the differential is much, much larger than it actually is.