←back to thread

303 points vyrotek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
judah ◴[] No.45894501[source]
This is interesting for sure. Kudos for bringing this capability to the web!

One issue the demos reveal is, it doesn't _feel_ like the web. That is, I can't hit Ctrl+F to find text on a page. I can't select text with my cursor. I can't copy the address of a hyperlink. On my phone, I can't hard press on an image and share it to others. Screen readers can't handle it. I can't press a shortcut key to make everything larger.

These all may seem pedantic, but they contribute to the feeling "this is not the real web."

This is the same problem with Java applets in the late '90s, Flash and Silverlight in the early 2000s. They are islands of richness within a web page, but those islands are, well, opaque to browsers, search engines, and virtually all web tooling.

replies(14): >>45894544 #>>45894696 #>>45894702 #>>45894958 #>>45895158 #>>45895191 #>>45896100 #>>45896594 #>>45896771 #>>45897067 #>>45897513 #>>45899135 #>>45899880 #>>45902162 #
1. jermaustin1 ◴[] No.45902162[source]
> They are islands of richness within a web page.

1000% - as a dotnet developer with 20 years under my belt, I currently don't see the reasoning behind this. With modern browsers, CSS/JS/HTML does SO much, you just don't have XAML. I like XAML (conceptually), but there is JSX for similar functionality, and it is at least compiled into real HTML, not just a applet.

I felt the same with silverlight as well. Why do we keep trying to reinvent Flash? We already have a far superior C# Flash in Unity compiled for Web (kind of a joke, but also not).