←back to thread

798 points bertman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
bilekas ◴[] No.45899689[source]
More and more recently with youtube, they seem to be more and more confrontational with their users, from outright blocking adblockers, which has no bearing on youtube's service, to automatically scraping creators content for AI training and now anything API related. They're very much aware that there is no real competition and so they're taking full advantage of it. At the expense of the 'users experience' but these days, large companies simply don't suffer from a bad customer experience anymore.
replies(4): >>45899733 #>>45900026 #>>45900039 #>>45905495 #
Arainach ◴[] No.45899733[source]
>outright blocking adblockers, which has no bearing on youtube's service

The scale of data storage, transcoding compute, and bandwidth to run YouTube is staggering. I'm open to the idea that adblocking doesn't have much effect on a server just providing HTML and a few images, but YouTube's operating costs are (presumably, I haven't looked into it) staggering and absolutely incompatible with adblocking.

replies(3): >>45899921 #>>45900423 #>>45900472 #
bitmasher9 ◴[] No.45899921[source]
That’s fine, but YouTube has an obligation to make sure the ads they serve aren’t scams. They are falling short of that obligation.
replies(1): >>45900550 #
ethmarks ◴[] No.45900550[source]
Could you elaborate on why? It seems to me that YouTube's implicit contract with the user is "these people paid us to show you this advert", not "we vouch for the integrity and veracity of this advert". I obviously agree that it'd be nice if YouTube would put more effort into screening adverts, but I don't see why they're _obligated_ to. I'm happy to be corrected, though.
replies(3): >>45901695 #>>45901736 #>>45908072 #
1. unethical_ban ◴[] No.45901695[source]
They have the money and the world would be better.