←back to thread

443 points wg0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
FatalLogic ◴[] No.45898892[source]
The online edition was edited later.

"This newspaper report was originally edited using AI, which is in violation of Dawn’s current AI policy. The policy is also available on our website. The report also carried some junk, which has now been edited out. The matter is being investigated. The violation of AI policy is regretted. — Editor"

https://www.dawn.com/news/1954574

edit: Text link of the printed edition. Might not be perfect OCR, but I don't think they changed anything except to delete the AI comment at the end! https://pastebin.com/NYarkbwm

replies(2): >>45899052 #>>45899372 #
nicbou ◴[] No.45899052[source]
> The violation of AI policy is regretted.

That's a good example of when you shouldn't use passive voice.

replies(6): >>45899199 #>>45899444 #>>45899604 #>>45900002 #>>45900587 #>>45900591 #
benterix ◴[] No.45899199[source]
OTOH kudos to them for regretting AI slop (even if they don't want to point out who precisely is regretting). I know some who'd vehemently deny in spite of evidence.
replies(1): >>45899523 #
serial_dev ◴[] No.45899523[source]
They don't regret serving you AI slop, they regret that the "writer" didn't even read their own article and that they got caught because of it.
replies(1): >>45900998 #
1. IAmBroom ◴[] No.45900998[source]
"We regrets that mistakes were noticed."