Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy

This is the basic discovery process when OpenAI commits IP theft. They're trying to misinform the public of how justice process works.

> To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

The constitution is clear that the purpose of intellectual property is to promote progress. I feel that OpenAI is on the right side of that and this is not IP theft as long as they aren't reproducing others work in a non-transformative way.

Training the AI is clearly transformative (and lossy to boot). Giving the AI the ability to scrape and paraphrase others work is less clear and both sides each have valid arguments. I don't envy the judges that must make that call.

If they're reproducing NY Times articles, in full, that that is non-transformative. That's the point of the case.