←back to thread

443 points wg0 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
chrismorgan ◴[] No.45899143[source]
The current title (“Pakistani newspaper mistakenly prints AI prompt with the article”) isn’t correct, it wasn’t the prompt that was printed, but trailing chatbot fluff:

> If you want, I can also create an even snappier “front-page style” version with punchy one-line stats and a bold, infographic-ready layout—perfect for maximum reader impact. Do you want me to do that next?

The article in question is titled “Auto sales rev up in October” and is an exceedingly dry slab of statistic-laden prose, of the sort that LLMs love to err in (though there’s no indication of whether they have or not), and for which alternative (non-prose) presentations can be drastically better. Honestly, if the entire thing came from “here’s tabular data, select insights and churn out prose”… I can understand not wanting to do such drudgework.

replies(9): >>45899255 #>>45899348 #>>45899636 #>>45899711 #>>45899852 #>>45900787 #>>45902114 #>>45903466 #>>45904945 #
michaelbuckbee ◴[] No.45899711[source]
For years, both the financial and sports news sides of things have generated increasingly templated "articles", this just feels like the latest iteration.
replies(8): >>45899930 #>>45900236 #>>45900320 #>>45900682 #>>45901528 #>>45901990 #>>45902025 #>>45902084 #
1. jerf ◴[] No.45900682[source]
A non-"AI" template is probably getting filled in with numbers straight from some relevant source. AI may produce something more conversational today but as someone else observed, this is a high-hallucination point for them. Even if they get one statistic right they're pretty inclined to start making up statistics that weren't provided to them at all if they sound good.