←back to thread

299 points gastonmorixe | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.401s | source
Show context
imglorp ◴[] No.45899116[source]
The project has been hungry for years.

There was a fork to clean up and secure the implementation: https://ntpsec.org and ideally they would combine forces.

Summarized here: https://lwn.net/Articles/713901

replies(1): >>45899958 #
tptacek ◴[] No.45899958[source]
Yeah the ntpsec story, not great. I don't believe they're taken especially seriously. There are people close to Harlan Stenn who believe the project is essentially fraudulent.
replies(2): >>45900118 #>>45900406 #
1. chocalot ◴[] No.45900406[source]
An ntpd-rs contributor elsewhere in the thread suggests ntpsec is used by many distributions, and suggests donating to ntpsec (amongst some other organisations).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45900184

replies(1): >>45901332 #
2. akerl_ ◴[] No.45901332[source]
Every distribution I've seen is using chrony or systemd-timesyncd. Is there a distribution that's actually using ntpsec?