Most active commenters
  • Tabular-Iceberg(5)
  • Defletter(4)
  • naIak(3)
  • GuinansEyebrows(3)

←back to thread

Laptops with Stickers

(stickertop.art)
610 points z303 | 11 comments | 02 Nov 25 11:58 UTC | HN request time: 0.002s | source | bottom
Show context
grafelic ◴[12 Nov 25 10:27 UTC] No.45898512[source]▶
My laptop hasn't had stickers since a CTO asked why mine didn't have any stickers like the ones on the laptops of his cool cloud team. Personally I've found laptop stickers bad taste since then.
replies(11): >>45898694 #>>45898858 #>>45898859 #>>45899188 #>>45899988 #>>45901654 #>>45902317 #>>45902441 #>>45902594 #>>45902657 #>>45902749 #
naIak ◴[12 Nov 25 11:26 UTC] No.45898858[source]▶
To me stickers on laptops are as tasteless and kitschy as tattoos. I would never get a tattoo for the same reason I would never put a sticker on my laptop.

Besides nobody gives a shit about your stupid political opinions or the software stack you use.

replies(6): >>45898945 #>>45899080 #>>45899640 #>>45899810 #>>45900407 #>>45900778 #
Tabular-Iceberg ◴[12 Nov 25 11:57 UTC] No.45899080[source]▶
They won't give a shit about your political opinions as long as it's one of those in the linked gallery of corporate-friendly pre-approved ones.

Anything right of center and suddenly people start caring very much.

replies(2): >>45899167 #>>45899778 #
naIak ◴[12 Nov 25 12:07 UTC] No.45899167[source]▶
Of course, that's another thing. The site is full of "down with the system" types which are, for some reason, oblivious to the irony of their values being aligned with the corporate values of businesses that have a valuation of trillions.
replies(1): >>45899416 #
Defletter ◴[12 Nov 25 12:38 UTC] No.45899416[source]▶
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-should-improve-society-som...
replies(1): >>45899876 #
1. Defletter ◴[12 Nov 25 13:42 UTC] No.45900064[source]▶
> keeping women chained to their desks and away from children

> glorification of every other sexual special interest except the productive one

Yikes, someone should check your harddrives

replies(1): >>45900308 #
2. naIak ◴[12 Nov 25 14:03 UTC] No.45900308[source]▶
Those are your arguments, a stupid fucking comic and calling someone a paedophile.
replies(2): >>45900361 #>>45902238 #
3. Defletter ◴[12 Nov 25 14:08 UTC] No.45900361{3}[source]▶
Once either of you present an argument worthy of respect within a civil and democratic society, I will respond in kind. Until then, statements like "the glorification of every other sexual special interest except the productive one" will continue to get the responses they deserve.
replies(1): >>45901430 #
4. Tabular-Iceberg ◴[12 Nov 25 15:33 UTC] No.45901430{4}[source]▶
What do you think I have on my hard drives? I'm genuinely confused by that comment.
5. Tabular-Iceberg ◴[12 Nov 25 16:37 UTC] No.45902238{3}[source]▶
Of course only a pedophile would even think of having intercourse with a woman who has not yet entered menopause.

I should probably also get the lethal injection for being a product of such a sick and depraved congress, because apparently a child is guilty of the crimes of the father.

6. GuinansEyebrows ◴[12 Nov 25 17:24 UTC] No.45902892[source]▶
sometimes i forget that other critics of capital can also have regressive troglodyte opinions on gender roles and sexuality. thanks for the reminder!
replies(1): >>45904060 #
7. Tabular-Iceberg ◴[12 Nov 25 18:40 UTC] No.45904060[source]▶
What if furthering the human species through the use of stable two-parent households happens to be my kink? You wouldn't kink shame, would you?

It will always be funny to me how little it takes for the mask of limitless tolerance to slip and reveal what you people think of those of us who dare even dream of deviating from the prevailing social norms.

replies(2): >>45904679 #>>45907344 #
8. Defletter ◴[12 Nov 25 19:11 UTC] No.45904679{3}[source]▶
This would do rounds on TruthSocial or X, The Everything App. Might I suggest moving this conversation over there?
9. GuinansEyebrows ◴[12 Nov 25 21:57 UTC] No.45907344{3}[source]▶
you are responding to arguments i have not made. would you care to engage with my criticism of your views or do you want to continue making things up?
replies(1): >>45907932 #
10. Tabular-Iceberg ◴[12 Nov 25 22:44 UTC] No.45907932{4}[source]▶
What criticism, calling them "regressive troglodyte opinions" without any substantiation? You're not trying to have an argument, you're just trying to start a flame war.
replies(1): >>45907984 #
11. GuinansEyebrows ◴[12 Nov 25 22:48 UTC] No.45907984{5}[source]▶
ok, let me "hn-speak" what's already a clear position that you understand that i hold:

i think your views on women's roles are ridiculous, to the point of deserving hyperbolic comparison. your position is misogynistic, bigoted and repulsive to the ideas of self-determination, social equity, liberty, and nonaggression... summarized perhaps irreverently but not inaccurately by the phrasing "regressive troglodyte."

but you knew what i was saying.