←back to thread

285 points ridruejo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
stackskipton ◴[] No.45893105[source]
As someone who has some familiarity with this process, just like safety regulations are written in blood, Federal Acquisition rules are written in misuse of money, sometimes criminally.

Yes, we have swung too much towards the bureaucrats but I'm not sure throwing out everything is solution to the issue.

Move fast works great when it's B2B software and failures means stock price does not go up. It's not so great when brand new jet acts up and results in crashes.

Oh yea, F-35 was built with move fast, they rolled models off the production line quickly, so Lockheed could get more money, but it looks like whole "We will fix busted models later" might have been more expensive. Time will tell.

replies(21): >>45893777 #>>45893843 #>>45893847 #>>45893934 #>>45894255 #>>45894410 #>>45894990 #>>45895591 #>>45895700 #>>45895838 #>>45896005 #>>45896219 #>>45896396 #>>45897182 #>>45897650 #>>45897842 #>>45899571 #>>45899715 #>>45899941 #>>45901076 #>>45902745 #
almosthere ◴[] No.45897182[source]
> brand new jet acts up and results in crashes

The thing is, we waste so much money it's better to crash 15 jets but build 2000 of them than waste the same amount of money and build 5 jets.

Even us SWEs out in the wild, we sometimes... disable tests (gasp heard everywhere) so that a refactor can work.

I mean it's why we have the expression "sometimes you have to crack a few eggs".

replies(1): >>45897202 #
efnx ◴[] No.45897202[source]
That’s putting a pretty low price on human life.
replies(2): >>45897213 #>>45899683 #
1. ACCount37 ◴[] No.45899683{3}[source]
We're talking modern fighter jets. You can fly those around with a mass simulator in the pilot seat.