←back to thread

287 points ridruejo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.38s | source
Show context
Hizonner ◴[] No.45893811[source]
The United States does not have a "Department of War".
replies(7): >>45893832 #>>45893872 #>>45895968 #>>45896367 #>>45899761 #>>45902524 #>>45902935 #
thaunatos ◴[] No.45893832[source]
It does. https://www.war.gov/
replies(5): >>45893846 #>>45893856 #>>45893909 #>>45893955 #>>45897339 #
felixgallo ◴[] No.45893856[source]
nope: https://www.military.com/feature/2025/10/17/department-of-wa...
replies(1): >>45893863 #
gjsman-1000 ◴[] No.45893863[source]
Nobody uses statutory titles for anything to be honest; when’s the last time you referred to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act instead of “Obamacare”? When’s the last time you referred to the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program instead of “Social Security”? I’ve never heard anyone say Title XIX of the Social Security Act instead of “Medicaid,” or Title XVIII of the Social Security Act instead of “Medicare,” or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act instead of “Welfare.”
replies(3): >>45893928 #>>45893961 #>>45894570 #
soulofmischief ◴[] No.45894570[source]
I say ACA, Obamacare is politically charged. And the cases you've mentioned all shorten a long name into a colloquial name. This is not the case for Department of War/Defense.

That said, let's call it what it is... it's a war machine. Just as we should refer to Israeli Occupation Forces and not "Defense" forces, since genocidal occupation is just about the furthest thing from defense.

replies(1): >>45897969 #
1. fnordpiglet ◴[] No.45897969[source]
I’ll always remember the turn around phrase that was a Yankee Doodle dandy moment “Obamacare because Obama cares”

It’s not a war machine, it’s a pork processing system for Congress.