←back to thread

760 points MindBreaker2605 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
sebmellen ◴[] No.45897467[source]
Making LeCun report to Wang was the most boneheaded move imaginable. But… I suppose Zuckerberg knows what he wants, which is AI slopware and not truly groundbreaking foundation models.
replies(20): >>45897481 #>>45897498 #>>45897518 #>>45897885 #>>45897970 #>>45897978 #>>45898040 #>>45898053 #>>45898092 #>>45898108 #>>45898186 #>>45898539 #>>45898651 #>>45898727 #>>45899160 #>>45899375 #>>45900884 #>>45900885 #>>45901421 #>>45903451 #
gnaman ◴[] No.45897498[source]
He is also not very interested in LLMs, and that seems to be Zuck's top priority.
replies(2): >>45897523 #>>45898412 #
tinco ◴[] No.45897523[source]
Yeah I think LeCun is underestimating the impact that LLM's and Diffusion models are going to have, even considering the huge impact they're already having. That's no problem as I'm sure whatever LeCun is working on is going to be amazing as well, but an enterprise like Facebook can't have their top researcher work on risky things when there's surefire paths to success still available.
replies(12): >>45897552 #>>45897567 #>>45897579 #>>45897666 #>>45897673 #>>45898027 #>>45898041 #>>45898615 #>>45898873 #>>45899785 #>>45900106 #>>45900288 #
1. hodgehog11 ◴[] No.45897567{3}[source]
Unless I've missed a few updates, much of the JEPA stuff didn't really bear a lot of fruit in the end.
replies(1): >>45905142 #
2. HarHarVeryFunny ◴[] No.45905142[source]
I don't think he's given up on it.

How many decades did it take for neural nets to take off?

The reason we're even talking about LeCun today is because he was early in seeing the promise of neural nets and stuck with it through the whole AI winter when most people thought it was a waste of time.