←back to thread

303 points nikolay | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
burke ◴[] No.45896363[source]
I have used perkeep. I still do at least in theory. I love the concept of it but it’s become… not quite abandonware, but it never gained enough traction to really take on a full life of its own before the primary author moved on. A bit of a tragedy because the basic idea is pretty compelling.
replies(5): >>45896421 #>>45896445 #>>45897043 #>>45899323 #>>45901540 #
frio ◴[] No.45896421[source]
I've been similarly half-interested in it for... more than a decade now. The new release (which is what I assume prompted this post) looks pretty impressive (https://github.com/perkeep/perkeep/releases/tag/v0.12).
replies(2): >>45896446 #>>45896614 #
kamranjon ◴[] No.45896446[source]
I immediately thought about how this would be awesome if it worked with tailscale - pretty complimentary tech I think.
replies(1): >>45896887 #
vermilingua ◴[] No.45896887[source]
Why would this need to work with Tailscale? It just needs to be running on a machine in your tailnet to be accessible, what other integration is necessary?
replies(2): >>45897368 #>>45897793 #
1. tecleandor ◴[] No.45897368[source]
I think @kamranjon means that, before this tailscale compatible release happened, thought about how cool it be if it worked directly with tailscale.