←back to thread

1124 points CrankyBear | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.223s | source
Show context
prewett ◴[] No.45891553[source]
"They could shut down three product lines with an email"

If you (Amazon, in this case) can put it that way, it seems like throwing them 10 or 20 thousand a year would simply be a good insurance policy! Any benefits you might get in goodwill and influence are a bonus.

replies(1): >>45891676 #
kwanbix ◴[] No.45891676[source]
How do you think Jeff got a 500 million dollars yacht? Not by writing checks.

But on a more serious note, it is crazy that between Google and Amazon they can not fund them with 50k each per year, so that they can pay people to work on this.

Specially Google, with Youtube, they can very easily pay them more. 100k~200k easily.

replies(4): >>45891802 #>>45891810 #>>45892500 #>>45893069 #
doctorwho42 ◴[] No.45891810[source]
What's wild is the importance and impact of the work/tool. And for google and Amazon, $50k-$100k/yr isn't even a single engineer salary to them ...

And they get the tool + community good will, all for a rounding error on any part of their budgets...

replies(1): >>45891839 #
kwanbix ◴[] No.45891839[source]
Exactly.

That is why I said easily 100~200k. It will be a rounding error for them.

It is actually crazy that Google is not already hiring the main dev to work on ffmpeg with all the use they give it on Youtube.

I also wonder if it is maybe used by Netflix also.

replies(2): >>45892532 #>>45895273 #
1. EasyMark ◴[] No.45895273[source]
I'm just imagining them having 4 or 5 250K a year security workers pumping out endless bug reports for one guy in Norway who works on ffmpeg at night and weekends for free because he loves open source and demanding him meet their program deadlines lol