←back to thread

287 points ridruejo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
giraffe_lady ◴[] No.45887943[source]
Embarrassing regurgitation of propaganda. This is basically the military DOGE. Are these systems dysfunctional in some ways, could well-intended sweeping reforms improve them? Sure, maybe, I don't know much about it.

Is that what's happening here? No, this a way to get the existing functions out from under the oversight and constraints of acquisition laws to reduce friction for corruption and war profiteering.

If you fell for DOGE don't fall for this too.

replies(2): >>45888186 #>>45888983 #
NickC25 ◴[] No.45888186[source]
It's also allowing for "good enough" solutions to enter the field of battle.

Which is fucking frightening. We don't want "good enough", we want weapons that are fully capable and best-in-class. After all, that's why the Department's budget is nearly a trillion dollars a year. We aren't paying for good enough, we're paying for the best of the best of the best.

We should first solve for why we've allowed massive scope creep in the development of our flagship fighters, and why that scope creep has come at the cost of hundreds of billions of dollars to our nation. Yet we can't ask why the likes of Boeing or Lockheed Martin are allowed to function as entities that need to please Wall Street and lobbyists instead of scaring the living shit out of anyone who wishes to do us harm via pure technological prowess. We've allowed the management class to take over our defense manufacturing at great cost to our country.

replies(6): >>45892779 #>>45892841 #>>45892845 #>>45893131 #>>45894364 #>>45895769 #
SparkBomb ◴[] No.45894364[source]
Actually "good enough" is often actually superior to "best-in-class" and "fully capable" because they are simpler to make and as a result you can make more of them.

It is often better to have 1000 things that are "good enough" then 100 things that are "best-in-class".

replies(2): >>45894532 #>>45896425 #
1. abraae ◴[] No.45894532[source]
Quantity has a quality all of its own.

- Stalin