Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    1124 points CrankyBear | 12 comments | | HN request time: 0.629s | source | bottom
    1. skybrian ◴[] No.45892604[source]
    Here's a thread by Google's head of security that notes the ways they've contributed to FFmpeg over the years:

    https://x.com/argvee/status/1986194852669964528

    replies(4): >>45892932 #>>45892949 #>>45896741 #>>45898588 #
    2. FridgeSeal ◴[] No.45892932[source]
    Unfortunately, nobody not on Twitter can see anything except the first message, which just appears to be some corporate-deflection-speak.

    It’s a trillion dollar company. I’m sure they could find rifle through their couch cushions and find more than enough money and under-utilised devs to contribute finance or patches.

    replies(3): >>45893236 #>>45893276 #>>45893869 #
    3. strictnein ◴[] No.45892949[source]
    Nice to see coming from Google. Some other current and form Google employees were unfortunately not as professional in their interactions on Twitter in regards to this issue.
    4. tom_ ◴[] No.45893236[source]
    Try xcancel instead: https://xcancel.com/argvee/status/1986194852669964528
    5. ◴[] No.45893276[source]
    6. izacus ◴[] No.45893869[source]
    Google is one of the largest contributors to OSS in the world, so they're already throwing literal millions at OSS?
    replies(2): >>45894961 #>>45896170 #
    7. Jyaif ◴[] No.45894961{3}[source]
    They have thousands of highly paid employees working on open source; they are spending at least 1 billion per year.
    8. FridgeSeal ◴[] No.45896170{3}[source]
    I’m sure they can take a moment of their _busy schedules_ to send a patch then.

    Especially if they’ve just spent all this cash on some ai tool.

    replies(1): >>45897315 #
    9. lofaszvanitt ◴[] No.45896741[source]
    If you rely on it, pay for it. So easy. Especially if you are a BIIG company. Money gives the maintainers joy, free time and appreciation for their work.

    Wakey wakey people, FOSS is here to F you. It can be free, while those, who rely on it and using it, also pay for it.

    10. izacus ◴[] No.45897315{4}[source]
    I'm sure you can as well. I had no issues contributing to ffmpeg under my company payroll before, why not you?
    11. mellosouls ◴[] No.45898588[source]
    To help those without access to X, the PR thread linked appears to give 2014 as the last time they reported solid contributions to helping fix security issues in ffmpeg.

    https://security.googleblog.com/2014/01/ffmpeg-and-thousand-...

    replies(1): >>45907265 #
    12. skybrian ◴[] No.45907265[source]
    While technically accurate, this is selective quoting, leaving out other contributions.

    Here's an archive link:

    https://xcancel.com/argvee/status/1986194852669964528