←back to thread

1125 points CrankyBear | 7 comments | | HN request time: 1.26s | source | bottom
Show context
justahuman74 ◴[] No.45891782[source]
Does Google seriously not have a whole team of people who help maintain ffmpeg?
replies(3): >>45892013 #>>45892081 #>>45898545 #
adastra22 ◴[] No.45892013[source]
Yes. But they don’t upstream. Why would they?
replies(2): >>45892550 #>>45896080 #
1. justahuman74 ◴[] No.45892550[source]
Great, they can fix the bugs being filed by another part of their company
replies(2): >>45892646 #>>45894991 #
2. Ferret7446 ◴[] No.45892646[source]
So would you rather Google have a secure ffmpeg while us plebian individual users continue to have an insecure ffmpeg?
replies(1): >>45897331 #
3. warkdarrior ◴[] No.45894991[source]
They probably fixed in the internal version.
4. GaryBluto ◴[] No.45897331[source]
It's frustrating to me how many people are siding with FFmpeg here considering how unprofessional and generally asshole-ish they are being.

I feel that this is mostly a kneejerk reaction to AI and Google in general, with people coming up with arguments to support their reaction after already forming an opinion.

replies(1): >>45900762 #
5. NoGravitas ◴[] No.45900762{3}[source]
It's a volunteer project, they have no requirement to be 'professional'. That's basically the root of the whole issue. A hobby project is not a product, and its developers are not vendors. Free software is not a supply chain.
replies(2): >>45904395 #>>45905758 #
6. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.45904395{4}[source]
The word "unprofessional" here is muddying the comment more than it helps.

Let's just saying they're being asshole-ish, which is a problem for volunteer projects just as much as non-volunteer ones.

The ffmpeg twitter sucks.

7. joshuamorton ◴[] No.45905758{4}[source]
> A hobby project is not a product, and its developers are not vendors

But it's developers do offer paid consulting as ffmpeg maintainers, which Google does pay for.