29 points mr_o47 | 9 comments | | HN request time: 1.041s | source | bottom
1. systemerror ◴[] No.45903306[source]
Why does air-gapped environment require rolling your own CI/CD solution? Plenty of examples of air-gapped Jenkins and/or Argo Workflows. Was this just an educational exercise?
replies(3): >>45904073 #>>45906749 #>>45906809 #
2. mr_o47 ◴[] No.45904073[source]
This was more like an educational exercise
replies(1): >>45904136 #
3. esafak ◴[] No.45904136{3}[source]
Since you're exercising, you can take it to the next level where you don't specify the next step but the inputs to each task, allowing you to infer the DAG and implement caching...
replies(1): >>45906728 #
4. ◴[] No.45906116[source]
5. verdverm ◴[] No.45906728{4}[source]
You can do this with cue/flow, but have not turned it into a full CI system. The building blocks are there
replies(1): >>45907355 #
6. verdverm ◴[] No.45906749[source]
Jenkins sucks but is insanely reliable

Argo Workflows does not live up to what they advertise, it is so much more complex to setup and then build workflows for. Helm + Argo is pain (both use the same template delimiters...)

7. piker ◴[] No.45906809[source]
It seems like a simple CI/CD in an airgapped environment might be simpler to implement than to (1) learn and (2) onboard an off-the-shelf solution when your airgapped requirement limits your ability to leverage the off-the-shelf ecosystem.
8. mr_o47 ◴[] No.45907355{5}[source]
Never heard of cue/flow will definitely check it out