Judge denies request to exempt Flock footage from Public Records Act

(www.heraldnet.com)
36 points ourmandave | 7 comments | 09 Nov 25 00:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.823s | source | bottom
1. tobinfekkes ◴[09 Nov 25 01:33 UTC] No.45862069[source]▶
Wow. Don't see Stanwood on HN very often/ever.

~ Tobin, in Stanwood

replies(1): >>45862623 #
2. foundart ◴[09 Nov 25 02:15 UTC] No.45862305[source]▶
This post has the better title, but there is more discussion over at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45861635
replies(2): >>45862324 #>>45862406 #
3. hammock ◴[09 Nov 25 02:19 UTC] No.45862324[source]▶
Wrong link
4. gnabgib ◴[09 Nov 25 02:38 UTC] No.45862406[source]▶
King 5: Judge orders police to release surveillance camera data, raising privacy questions (11 points, 10 hours ago, 2 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45857944

Skagit Valley Herald: Court denies request that it find Flock Safety camera data is exempt from Public Records Act (32 points, 1 hours ago, 7 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45861829

5. Wistar ◴[09 Nov 25 03:22 UTC] No.45862623[source]▶
I love the Stanwood area.
6. tomhow ◴[09 Nov 25 03:28 UTC] No.45862655[source]▶
Active discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45861829.