←back to thread

Affinity Studio now free

(www.affinity.studio)
1205 points dagmx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
pentagrama ◴[] No.45762521[source]
I used Affinity for several years, so to add some background here:

Serif is the company that originally built this software.

--------

2014–2024

Serif developed the Affinity suite, a collection of three independent desktop apps sold with a one-time payment model:

- Affinity Designer: vector graphic design (Adobe Illustrator equivalent)

- Affinity Photo: digital image editing (Adobe Photoshop equivalent)

- Affinity Publisher: print and layout design (Adobe InDesign equivalent)

They were solid, professional tools without subscriptions like Adobe, a big reason why many designers loved them.

-------

2024

Canva acquired Serif.

-------

2025 (today)

The product has been relaunched. The three apps are now merged into a single app, simply called Affinity, and it follows a freemium model.

From what I’ve tested, you need a Canva account to download and open the app (you can opt out of some telemetry during setup).

The new app has four tabs:

- Vector: formerly Affinity Designer

- Pixel: formerly Affinity Photo

- Layout: formerly Affinity Publisher

- Canva AI: a new, paid AI-powered section

Screenshot https://imgur.com/a/h1S6fcK

Hope can help!

replies(16): >>45762570 #>>45763276 #>>45763555 #>>45763695 #>>45763766 #>>45763807 #>>45764042 #>>45764560 #>>45765389 #>>45765538 #>>45765942 #>>45767528 #>>45769728 #>>45769747 #>>45770368 #>>45770565 #
bovermyer ◴[] No.45764042[source]
Thank you for the context. I was an Affinity Suite user for a long time after I dropped Adobe.

I now use a mixture of GIMP, Krita, and Inkscape for visual things. I don't have a good alternative for InDesign - even Affinity Publisher wasn't one. Since my tabletop RPG business closed, I haven't had a need for a powerful layout application. I just use Typst or LaTeX for my personal projects that need a layout engine.

replies(5): >>45764644 #>>45768451 #>>45769118 #>>45769398 #>>45769619 #
insane_dreamer ◴[] No.45768451[source]
> don't have a good alternative for InDesign

There really is none, at least not that is comparable. InDesign is perhaps the one product where Adobe really shines.

Aldus PageMaker and Quark XPress were worthy predecessors; I used both back in the day, but Adobe bought PageMaker and discontinued it. As for Quark, not sure what happened to them but they're not around anymore.

replies(1): >>45769133 #
timc3 ◴[] No.45769133[source]
I used Quark XPress, and it really felt like it had a monopoly on the professional market in the UK at the time. It didn't really innovate, it was slow and clunky. Then InDesign came along and it was a breath of fresh air.

Took many years for the transition to happen, but a lot of people in my circle wanted to see the back of Quark.

replies(1): >>45770987 #
zvr ◴[] No.45770987[source]
Don't forget FrameMaker, who was also very much in use for structured, long documentation.
replies(1): >>45785527 #
1. macintux ◴[] No.45785527[source]
When I worked in desktop publishing (35 years ago, sigh) we used Ready, Set, Go extensively. Certainly seemed like a more intuitive UI than what little I've seen of Quark, at least.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ready,_Set,_Go!_(software)