←back to thread

571 points layer8 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
FinnKuhn ◴[] No.45766467[source]
> The last chance for an agreement under Danish leadership is in December; the government in Copenhagen apparently preferred a compromise without chat control to no agreement at all. The current regulation, which allows the large platform providers to voluntarily and actively search for potential depictions of abuse, expires next spring after extension. It is precisely this voluntariness that Denmark's Minister of Justice now wants to codify within the framework of the future CSA regulation, which also contains a multitude of other, less controversial projects. [1]

Doesn't sound like it is over yet - only delayed.

[1] https://www.heise.de/en/news/Denmark-surprisingly-abandons-p...

replies(6): >>45766727 #>>45766789 #>>45766836 #>>45766914 #>>45767401 #>>45771111 #
standardUser[dead post] ◴[] No.45767401[source]
[flagged]
0xDEAFBEAD ◴[] No.45767908[source]
The job of the US Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution, not pass laws. "Interpreting" the Constitution and concluding that it contains a right to abortion, when the constitution says nothing whatsoever about abortion, was an absurdly "creative" interpretation. The left was undermining the constitution long before Donald Trump started to do so.
replies(2): >>45768775 #>>45785257 #
1. standardUser ◴[] No.45785257[source]
I said "nothing's ever over" when it comes to human rights, I did not say please offer me a dimwit's assessment of the role of the Supreme Court.