←back to thread

455 points akyuu | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
derbOac ◴[] No.45766747[source]
They couldn't answer the question most on my mind: "We’ve reached out to Google to inquire about why a custom ROM created by volunteers is more resistant to industrial phone hacking than the official Pixel OS. We’ll update this article if Google has anything to say."
replies(10): >>45766778 #>>45777056 #>>45778032 #>>45778056 #>>45779079 #>>45779102 #>>45779404 #>>45780503 #>>45781099 #>>45783125 #
LoganDark ◴[] No.45778032[source]
GrapheneOS makes security trade-off that are inconvenient to the user. This results in a far more secure device, but nonetheless a device that the general public would find far more annoying. Google would lose a proportion of its user base by implementing the same protections.

Example: https://old.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/ytk1ng/graphen...

Also Google Pay is missing.

replies(4): >>45778078 #>>45779111 #>>45779935 #>>45780063 #
zb3 ◴[] No.45778078[source]
Which particular thing you consider inconvenient or even annoying? You can even install Google Play there.

I see just one minor tradeoff - no face unlock.

replies(4): >>45778348 #>>45778541 #>>45779117 #>>45781598 #
chasil ◴[] No.45781598[source]
They removed pattern lock, which makes me uncomfortable.

I don't care for touch/fingerprint (or face) because biometrics aren't protected in the fifth amendment right to be free from self-incrimination.

The only screen lock is PIN.

replies(2): >>45782122 #>>45784401 #
1. raw_anon_1111 ◴[] No.45784401[source]
You give way too much credit that law enforcement cares about the law and won’t just use rubber hose decryption.