←back to thread

176 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
oxqbldpxo ◴[] No.45765471[source]
All these companies depend on TSMC for their life.
replies(4): >>45765560 #>>45765582 #>>45765677 #>>45777141 #
nomilk ◴[] No.45765677[source]
Had to look up what TSMC meant (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company).

What would Apple's next best option be if a war rendered TSMC unavailable?

replies(4): >>45765712 #>>45765755 #>>45766068 #>>45766664 #
45764986 ◴[] No.45766068[source]
If a war rendered TSMC unavailable it would crash the global economy. There is no next best option.
replies(1): >>45777073 #
astrange ◴[] No.45777073[source]
Samsung, Intel, SMIC are not incredibly far behind. TSMC is the best because we (the US and its customers) trust them more than its competitors and so fund its R&D and license them more exclusive technologies.
replies(1): >>45777513 #
dontlaugh ◴[] No.45777513[source]
SMIC in particular have made very quick progress. They’d probably match TSMC first in such a scenario.
replies(2): >>45777779 #>>45783911 #
ta9000 ◴[] No.45777779[source]
In case of a war, SMIC would likely also be unavailable.
replies(1): >>45783933 #
1. dontlaugh ◴[] No.45783933[source]
Unavailable to whom exactly?