←back to thread

149 points whack | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.224s | source
Show context
breppp ◴[] No.45780585[source]
Very interesting, I am hardly an expert, but this gives the impression that if only without that meddling software we will all live in a synchronous world.

This ignores store buffers and consequently memory fencing which is the basis for the nightmarish std::memory_order, the worst api documentation you will ever meet

replies(1): >>45783071 #
1. jeffbee ◴[] No.45783071[source]
If the committee had any good taste at all they would have thrown DEC AXP overboard before C++11, which would have cut the majority of the words out of the specification for std::memory_order. It was only the obsolete and quite impossible to program Alpha CPU that requires the ultimate level of complexity.