←back to thread

194 points sleirsgoevy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asimops ◴[] No.45776925[source]
While it is technically feasible, it is not a good idea to try and find a technical solution to a people/organisation problem.

Do not accept the premise of assholes.

I hope we can get the EU to fund a truly open Android Fork. Maybe under some organisation similar to NL Labs.

--- edit ---

Furthermore, the need for a trustworthy binary to be auditable to a certain hash or something would make banning this a simple task if Google would want to go that route.

replies(8): >>45777355 #>>45778228 #>>45778511 #>>45779765 #>>45779867 #>>45780458 #>>45780743 #>>45781937 #
closeparen ◴[] No.45778511[source]
The same EU that's doing Chat Control?
replies(5): >>45778682 #>>45779494 #>>45779799 #>>45780908 #>>45781445 #
supermatt ◴[] No.45781445[source]
It appears that you are an American who has conveniently forgotten about FISA, EARN IT, CLOUD act, PATRIOT act, LAED, etc, etc, and wants to take a dig at the EU for what, exactly? NOT passing Chat Control? Seriously..
replies(3): >>45782748 #>>45782787 #>>45782902 #
1. ◴[] No.45782748[source]