←back to thread

Addiction Markets

(www.thebignewsletter.com)
384 points toomuchtodo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
shipman05 ◴[] No.45778266[source]
It feels like banning advertising for gambling would be a sweet spot between harm reduction and maintaining individual liberty.

Sports gambling ads have ruined sports media. State lottery ads are even worse. The government should not spend money to encourage its own citizens to partake in harmful activities.

replies(11): >>45778585 #>>45779037 #>>45779401 #>>45779688 #>>45779694 #>>45780698 #>>45780860 #>>45781031 #>>45781055 #>>45781172 #>>45782629 #
ACCount37 ◴[] No.45781055[source]
"Make it legal but very annoying" is an underrated policy option. And banning advertisement is the first resort in this line of regulation.

If there are no ads to tell you, you have to, first, be informed that sports gambling is a thing people do, then decide that it's a thing you want participate in, and then obtain information on how it's done. This adds friction. Friction reduces participation. But if you really want to gamble? You still can.

replies(3): >>45781995 #>>45783174 #>>45784752 #
maxerickson ◴[] No.45781995[source]
So this is sort of a gotcha question, but I don't mean it that way.

Is it advertising when the announcer for a game talks about gambling? There's statements that obviously would be advertising, so the interesting thing is where and how to draw the line.

replies(2): >>45782174 #>>45783643 #
1. jakelazaroff ◴[] No.45782174[source]
I mean, are they being compensated for saying so? The sports gambling industry did not invent advertising; there are already clear laws that govern this.