Most active commenters
  • foofoo12(3)

←back to thread

579 points nh43215rgb | 13 comments | | HN request time: 0.728s | source | bottom
1. AndyKelley ◴[] No.45782234[source]
How do you know what you need to hide?
replies(1): >>45782928 #
2. mark_and_sweep ◴[] No.45782295[source]
As a German, I gotta ask: Is this a reference to Martin Niemöller's "First They Came"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_They_Came

replies(2): >>45782799 #>>45782874 #
3. mrbombastic ◴[] No.45782301[source]
Define the “you” you are talking about please.
4. thhoooowww0101 ◴[] No.45782338[source]
(edit: It seems that it was sarcasm! I didn't detect it!)

You'd think the HN crowd, with access to a lot of information, probably higher education, and basic knowledge of history, would be smarter than this, but maybe not.

5. sanex ◴[] No.45782412[source]
_at the moment_ lul
replies(1): >>45782791 #
6. foofoo12 ◴[] No.45782782[source]
Sacred shit guys. I was hoping the sarcasm would shine through with the "at the moment". But yes, this otherwise deserves all the downvoting!
replies(1): >>45788530 #
7. foofoo12 ◴[] No.45782791[source]
You got it!
8. foofoo12 ◴[] No.45782799[source]
Natürlich.
9. hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.45782874[source]
Almost certainly
10. boothby ◴[] No.45782928[source]
That's an awfully suspicious question to ask, don't you think?
11. ◴[] No.45783043[source]
12. anigbrowl ◴[] No.45784963[source]
I downvoted you even though I know you're being sarcastic. The reflexive use of snark and sarcasm is bad. Poe's law (observing the difficulty of separating sarcasm from actual nastiness) identifies a real problem: reflexive snark is easily weaponized by people who argue your position sincerely and use you as cover. They can always say they're trolling until suddenly they're not.
13. Jackson__ ◴[] No.45788530[source]
HN crowd really is not beating the allegations with these replies.