←back to thread

387 points reaperducer | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
vmg12 ◴[] No.45772274[source]
Here is a charitable perspective on what's happening:

- Nvidia has too much cash because of massive profits and has nowhere to reinvest them internally.

- Nvidia instead invests in other companies that use their gpus by providing them deals that must be spent on nvidia products.

- This accelerates the growth of these companies, drives further lock in to nvidia's platform, and gives nvidia an equity stake in these companies.

- Since growth for these companies is accelerated, future revenue will be brought forward for nvidia and since these investments must be spent on nvidia gpus it drives further lock in to their platform.

- Nvidia also benefits from growth due to the equity they own.

This is all dependent on token economics being or becoming profitable. Everything seems to indicate that once the models are trained, they are extremely profitable and that training is the big money drain. If these models become massively profitable (or at least break even) then I don't see how this doesn't benefit Nvidia massively.

replies(10): >>45772315 #>>45772353 #>>45772362 #>>45772398 #>>45775007 #>>45775428 #>>45775539 #>>45777876 #>>45778024 #>>45778343 #
pols45 ◴[] No.45772398[source]
Yup. Not just Nvidia. Just look at the quarterly results reported by Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft and Apple. Each one is reporting revenues never before seen in history. If you make 100 Billion a quarter you have to spend it on something.

These guys are running hyper optimized cash extraction mega machines. There is no comparison to previous bubbles, cause so no such companies ever existed in the past.

replies(5): >>45772456 #>>45772505 #>>45772648 #>>45774707 #>>45776323 #
skywhopper ◴[] No.45772648[source]
So many such profitable companies are the best possible evidence for the need for drastic antitrust intervention. The lack of competition and regulation is leading to a massive drain on every other sector.
replies(1): >>45774528 #
marbro ◴[] No.45774528[source]
This bubble is caused by excess competition. There are 4 large companies who believe that a large new market is being created so each is investing large amounts without any evidence that there will be a single winner that dominates the future market. None of these companies has anything remotely resembling a monopoly except for Amazon in online retail.
replies(2): >>45775599 #>>45780316 #
1. zigzag312 ◴[] No.45780316[source]
Monopolies being bad for free markets is a simplification. Substantial control over the market would be more accurate description of the issue.