←back to thread

Addiction Markets

(www.thebignewsletter.com)
387 points toomuchtodo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.386s | source
Show context
mberning ◴[] No.45775897[source]
I don’t have an overly paternalistic view of the government. I’m rather libertarian in that regard. But is it too much to ask that we place some guardrails on things that are know to have trouble with? Smoking, drinking, gambling, etc.

I certainly feel that people should be able to do it if they really want to, but making it super accessible and highly advertised seems like a bad idea.

replies(2): >>45776090 #>>45776418 #
skippyboxedhero ◴[] No.45776418[source]
There are guardrails. Gambling is legalised to introduce guardrails so that regulated providers can exist and provide a product that stops people using offshore.

Neither accessibility or advertising impacts rates of addiction. It is a real addiction. Does a lack of advertising stop heroin use? Behave.

replies(2): >>45778734 #>>45779504 #
1. energy123 ◴[] No.45779504[source]
So the number of smoking addicts magically went down over the last few decades?