←back to thread

569 points layer8 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
tokai ◴[] No.45766633[source]
It's interesting that Peter Hummelgaard's former party comrade Henrik Sass Larsen recently got 4 months of prison for possession of child porn; 6200 pictures and 2200 videos.

So we are to believe Hummelgaard wants to protect children by enabling vast surveillance, so all the bad offenders out there can get ... 4 months in prison.

Its not really adding up. And he still hasn't presented any argument for the thing except that you are pro child abuse if you don't agree with him. I'm at the point where I hope he's corrupt and its not just all about power for him.

replies(6): >>45766760 #>>45767612 #>>45768731 #>>45769020 #>>45769496 #>>45771120 #
zigzagger11 ◴[] No.45766760[source]
Is that out of line with similar offenses in Denmark?
replies(3): >>45766868 #>>45769224 #>>45774850 #
port11 ◴[] No.45774850[source]
Directive 2011/92/EU article 5.2 would suggest no less than 1 year of imprisonment. Depending on how kindly you read the other articles, and given how much pornography instances he had, I'd argue for more.
replies(1): >>45778931 #
1. giobox ◴[] No.45778931[source]
I'm slightly confused here; the EU Directive you are listing has absolutely no bearing on this discussion or the case at all?

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/92/oj/eng

Article 5.2 concerns environmental impact assessments?

Even ignoring all this, Directives do not themselves automatically become enforceable in member State's legal systems either - "Regulations" do, and this is not one, the trial will be conducted subject to Danish criminal law.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_(European_Union)