←back to thread

387 points reaperducer | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
rw3 ◴[] No.45771994[source]
Hank green did a vlog on this a few weeks ago and it’s a great explainer.
replies(2): >>45772116 #>>45777089 #
gtirloni ◴[] No.45772116[source]
This one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz0oQ0v0W10

This comment is pretty depressing but it seems to be the path we're headed to:

> It's bad enough that people think fake videos are real, but they also now think real videos are fake. My channel is all wildlife that I filmed myself in my own yard, and I've had people leaving comments that it's AI, because the lighting is too pretty or the bird is too cute. The real world is pretty and cute all the time, guys! That's why I'm filming it!

Combine this with selecting only what you want to believe in and you can say that video/image that goes against your "facts" is "fake AI". We already have some people in pretty powerful positions doing this to manipulate their bases.

replies(4): >>45772451 #>>45772813 #>>45773311 #>>45773383 #
throwaway106382 ◴[] No.45772451[source]
We are heading to an apocalyptic level of psychosis where human beings won't even believe the things they see with their own eyes are real anymore because of being flooded with AI slop 24/7/365.
replies(1): >>45772838 #
jimbokun ◴[] No.45772838[source]
We desperately need a technological solution to be able to somehow "sign" images and videos as being real and not generated or manipulated by AI.

I have no idea how such a thing would work.

replies(4): >>45773248 #>>45778762 #>>45783519 #>>45784137 #
1. ANighRaisin ◴[] No.45778762[source]
Such a thing exists currently, at least for images created by Google and other major AI companies.