←back to thread

My Impressions of the MacBook Pro M4

(michael.stapelberg.ch)
240 points secure | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.015s | source
Show context
dr_pardee ◴[] No.45775823[source]
> I still don’t like macOS and would prefer to run Linux on this laptop. But Asahi Linux still needs some work before it’s usable for me (I need external display output, and M4 support). This doesn’t bother me too much, though, as I don’t use this computer for serious work.

“I don’t use this computer for serious work.” Dropped $3K on MBP to play around with. Definitely should have gotten MBA

replies(4): >>45775861 #>>45775875 #>>45776174 #>>45778211 #
criddell ◴[] No.45775861[source]
If you are going to start making a list of expensive hobbies, $3K for a computer isn't going to be anywhere near the top of the list.
replies(5): >>45776000 #>>45776238 #>>45779286 #>>45782264 #>>45783277 #
IshKebab ◴[] No.45776000[source]
I think it actually would be quite near the top, in terms of ranking. Most hobbies are a lot cheaper.

Of course, not near the top in terms of money because there are a few hobbies that cost vastly more.

replies(5): >>45776354 #>>45777632 #>>45779020 #>>45782259 #>>45782604 #
brulard ◴[] No.45776354{3}[source]
What do you mean "in terms of ranking" vs "in terms of money"?
replies(2): >>45776916 #>>45778788 #
IshKebab ◴[] No.45776916{4}[source]
I mean if you ranked all the hobbies in terms of cost, casually spending $3k on a laptop would be near the top of the list. But there are a small number of hobbies that are vastly more expensive.

The distribution is highly skewed. Like wealth. The 99th percentile are near the top in rank (by definition) but nowhere near the top in absolute terms.

replies(2): >>45778736 #>>45780287 #
1. mingus88 ◴[] No.45778736{5}[source]
There’s some nuance to it.

Judging by the authors preference for Linux, I’m guessing this hobby has some professional applications as well.

$3k is the price of a very nice guitar, but I am not about to casually shell out that money every few years.

However, I earn my wage using a computer, so it’s a lot easier to justify staying relatively current on specs.

replies(1): >>45779263 #
2. leidenfrost ◴[] No.45779263[source]
I interpreted it as: if you include all hobbies and games made by humans in history, I'm pretty sure most of them involve a set of cards made of paper, some others involving wooden figurines (chess, checkers) or even drawing on dirt with a stick.

A computer is many, many orders of magnitude more complex and expensive than that.

This isn't said with the intention to demonize expensive hobbies if no one is harmed because of it.

But I do sometimes wonder if my hobbies are too dependent of a power plug. Even reading, which I do with a e-reader.