←back to thread

Tim Bray on Grokipedia

(www.tbray.org)
175 points Bogdanp | 1 comments | 31 Oct 25 21:41 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[31 Oct 25 21:53 UTC] No.45777117[source]▶
Why give it oxygen?
replies(6): >>45777142 #>>45777160 #>>45777311 #>>45777327 #>>45777329 #>>45777411 #
meowface ◴[31 Oct 25 21:59 UTC] No.45777160[source]▶
To play devil's advocate: Grok has historically actually been one of the biggest debunkers of right-wing misinformation and conspiracy theories on Twitter, contrary to popular conception. Elon keeps trying to tweak its system prompt to make it less effective at that, but Grokipedia was worth an initial look from me out of curiosity. It took me 10 seconds to realize it was ideologically-motivated garbage and significantly more right-biased than Wikipedia is left-biased.

(Unfortunately, Reply-Grok may have been successfully partially lobotomized for the long term, now. At the time of writing, if you ask grok.com about the 2020 election it says Biden won and Trump's fraud claims are not substantiated and have no merit. If you @grok in a tweet it now says Trump's claims of fraud have significant merit, when previously it did not. Over the past few days I've seen it place way too much charity in right-wing framings in other instances, as well.)

replies(4): >>45777225 #>>45777240 #>>45777294 #>>45777386 #
jayd16 ◴[31 Oct 25 22:16 UTC] No.45777294[source]▶
It's not controlled by a trusted actor so it doesn't matter how it happens to act at the moment.

They could pull the rug at any future time and its almost better to gain trust now and cash in that trust later.

replies(2): >>45777408 #>>45777438 #
1. kvirani ◴[31 Oct 25 22:30 UTC] No.45777408[source]▶
And the idea of it being controlled by any one entity makes it less interesting and less "good" when compared to Wikipedia