←back to thread

255 points ColinWright | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
Noumenon72 ◴[] No.45774469[source]
It doesn't seem that abusive. I don't comment things out thinking "this will keep robots from reading this".
replies(2): >>45774493 #>>45774628 #
mostlysimilar ◴[] No.45774628[source]
The article mentions using this as a means of detecting bots, not as a complaint that it's abusive.

EDIT: I was chastised, here's the original text of my comment: Did you read the article or just the title? They aren't claiming it's abusive. They're saying it's a viable signal to detect and ban bots.

replies(3): >>45774645 #>>45774743 #>>45776844 #
1. ang_cire ◴[] No.45776844[source]
They call the scrapers "malicious", so they are definitely complaining about them.

> A few of these came from user-agents that were obviously malicious:

(I love the idea that they consider any python or go request to be a malicious scraper...)