←back to thread

Leaker reveals which Pixels are vulnerable to Cellebrite phone hacking

(arstechnica.com)
446 points akyuu | 6 comments | 30 Oct 25 23:12 UTC | HN request time: 1.209s | source | bottom
1. chaps ◴[31 Oct 25 21:02 UTC] No.45776656[source]▶
Here's the full document without the blurriness: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24833831-cellebrite-...

(it's been available since 2024 -- found by searching for "android os access support matrix" on documentcloud)

replies(3): >>45776827 #>>45776837 #>>45777312 #
2. Infernal ◴[31 Oct 25 21:20 UTC] No.45776827[source]▶
The point here is that the doc you linked is a year and a half old, this (if real) is much newer. Security is a constant arms race between attackers and defenders, nothing is static so updates of this nature are always welcome.
replies(1): >>45776859 #
3. Squealer2642 ◴[31 Oct 25 21:21 UTC] No.45776837[source]▶
This one doesn't have Pixel 9's so the image in the article has been updated a bit.
4. chaps ◴[31 Oct 25 21:24 UTC] No.45776859[source]▶
I'm not disputing that. :)
replies(1): >>45776956 #
5. Infernal ◴[31 Oct 25 21:34 UTC] No.45776956{3}[source]▶
Fair, I suppose I've misunderstood. I took "it's been available since 2024" as a dismissal of this new information.
replies(1): >>45777554 #
6. chaps ◴[31 Oct 25 22:48 UTC] No.45777554{4}[source]▶
Also fair! I think "leaker" is just bristly to me in this context, when there's a nearly identical version of it just hanging out for folk to find. But also just a hope that some folk might poke around documentcloud for similar documents lying around. Lots of newsworthy gems in there just waiting to be picked up and this's a good example.