←back to thread

255 points ColinWright | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.445s | source
Show context
bakql ◴[] No.45775259[source]
>These were scrapers, and they were most likely trying to non-consensually collect content for training LLMs.

"Non-consensually", as if you had to ask for permission to perform a GET request to an open HTTP server.

Yes, I know about weev. That was a travesty.

replies(15): >>45775283 #>>45775392 #>>45775754 #>>45775912 #>>45775998 #>>45776008 #>>45776055 #>>45776210 #>>45776222 #>>45776270 #>>45776765 #>>45776932 #>>45777727 #>>45777934 #>>45778166 #
Calavar ◴[] No.45775392[source]
I agree. It always surprises me when people are indignant about scrapers ignoring robots.txt and throw around words like "theft" and "abuse."

robots.txt is a polite request to please not scrape these pages because it's probably not going to be productive. It was never meant to be a binding agreement, otherwise there would be a stricter protocol around it.

It's kind of like leaving a note for the deliveryman saying please don't leave packages on the porch. It's fine for low stakes situations, but if package security is of utmost importance to you, you should arrange to get it certified or to pick it up at the delivery center. Likewise if enforcing a rule of no scraping is of utmost importance you need to require an API token or some other form of authentication before you serve the pages.

replies(9): >>45775489 #>>45775674 #>>45776143 #>>45776484 #>>45776561 #>>45776927 #>>45777831 #>>45778192 #>>45779259 #
hsbauauvhabzb ◴[] No.45775489[source]
How else do you tell the bot you do not wish to be scraped? Your analogy is lacking - you didn’t order a package, you never wanted a package, and the postman is taking something, not leaving it, and you’ve explicitly left a sign saying ‘you are not welcome here’.
replies(5): >>45775544 #>>45775575 #>>45775693 #>>45775841 #>>45775924 #
1. davsti4 ◴[] No.45775693[source]
Its simple, and I'll quote myself - "robots.txt isn't the law".
replies(2): >>45777760 #>>45783518 #
2. ColinWright ◴[] No.45777760[source]
Quoting Cervisia :

> robots.txt. This is not the law

In Germany, it is the law. § 44b UrhG says (translated):

(1) Text and data mining is the automated analysis of one or more digital or digitized works to obtain information, in particular about patterns, trends, and correlations.

(2) Reproductions of lawfully accessible works for text and data mining are permitted. These reproductions must be deleted when they are no longer needed for text and data mining.

(3) Uses pursuant to paragraph 2, sentence 1, are only permitted if the rights holder has not reserved these rights. A reservation of rights for works accessible online is only effective if it is in machine-readable form.

-- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45776825

3. bigbuppo ◴[] No.45783518[source]
Violating norms makes you an abusive jerk at best.