←back to thread

589 points gmays | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
earless1 ◴[] No.45772465[source]
So biological garbage collection pauses then? skip sleep, and the brain tries to run gc cycles during runtime. Causing attention and performance latency spikes. Evolution wrote the original JVM.
replies(5): >>45772560 #>>45773351 #>>45776679 #>>45777047 #>>45778878 #
layer8 ◴[] No.45772560[source]
Luckily it doesn’t clear all unreferenced memory, though.
replies(5): >>45772666 #>>45772718 #>>45773046 #>>45773081 #>>45773625 #
ghurtado ◴[] No.45773625[source]
I realize you're making a joke, but there is no such thing as "unreferenced memories", as in, something that is no longer in use and has been removed from the brain.

Every memory your brain has ever produced is still there, even if most are beyond conscious access. Memories quite literally become a permanent part of you.

A lot of people mistakenly think of human memory as a sort of hard drive with limited capacity, with files being deleted to make room for new ones. It's very much not like that.

replies(4): >>45773664 #>>45773783 #>>45773860 #>>45773941 #
pdonis ◴[] No.45773664[source]
If you are implying that human memory has infinite capacity, that's not possible. The human brain is a finite, physical thing. It can't store an infinite amount of data.

If you just mean that human memory has a finite capacity that's much larger than anyone has come close to reaching by storing the memories of a normal human lifetime, that might make sense.

Do you have any references for your statements about memory? I'm not familiar with whatever science there is in this area.

replies(3): >>45773815 #>>45774224 #>>45775057 #
ghurtado ◴[] No.45773815[source]
I didn't mean either of the things that you are wondering whether I meant, so i can't give you evidence of those things you made up yourself.

If you have questions about my comment, I'm happy to try to explain myself better

"I didn't understand you at all, so you must have meant either A or B" is not the way to reach an understanding

replies(2): >>45773886 #>>45774322 #
vanviegen ◴[] No.45773886{3}[source]
Your words: "Every memory your brain has ever produced is still there [..]"

How would that not imply infinite storage?

replies(2): >>45773939 #>>45774419 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.45774419{4}[source]
It wouldn't imply infinite storage because human life is not infinite in time and memories do not accumulate at an infinite rate in storage consumed per unit time, so the total storage over a human lifespan is finite, so the claim can be true with finite storage.

It is almost certainly false, but it doesn't require infinite storage to be true.

replies(1): >>45775625 #
1. pdonis ◴[] No.45775625{5}[source]
> human life is not infinite in time and memories do not accumulate at an infinite rate in storage consumed per unit time

Which would put it into the category of the second part of my comment--which the person I was responding to said was not relevant to what they meant.