←back to thread

387 points reaperducer | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.222s | source
Show context
vmg12 ◴[] No.45772274[source]
Here is a charitable perspective on what's happening:

- Nvidia has too much cash because of massive profits and has nowhere to reinvest them internally.

- Nvidia instead invests in other companies that use their gpus by providing them deals that must be spent on nvidia products.

- This accelerates the growth of these companies, drives further lock in to nvidia's platform, and gives nvidia an equity stake in these companies.

- Since growth for these companies is accelerated, future revenue will be brought forward for nvidia and since these investments must be spent on nvidia gpus it drives further lock in to their platform.

- Nvidia also benefits from growth due to the equity they own.

This is all dependent on token economics being or becoming profitable. Everything seems to indicate that once the models are trained, they are extremely profitable and that training is the big money drain. If these models become massively profitable (or at least break even) then I don't see how this doesn't benefit Nvidia massively.

replies(10): >>45772315 #>>45772353 #>>45772362 #>>45772398 #>>45775007 #>>45775428 #>>45775539 #>>45777876 #>>45778024 #>>45778343 #
moogly ◴[] No.45775007[source]
> Nvidia has too much cash because of massive profits and has nowhere to reinvest them internally.

Here's an idea: they could make actual GPUs used for games affordable again, and not have Jensen Huang lie on stage about their performance to justify their astronomical prices. Sure, companies might want to buy them for ML/AI and crash the market again but I'm sure a company of their caliber could solve that if they _really_ wanted to.

replies(3): >>45775071 #>>45775116 #>>45778420 #
Lord-Jobo ◴[] No.45775116[source]
I also just don’t understand, as someone with no business experience, how they aren’t just pouring all of that money into enhancing their production capacity. That’s very clearly their bottleneck here.

Yes, I’m certain they are spending an astronomical amount on that already, but why not more? Surely paying more money for construction of more facilities still nets gain even if you run into diminishing returns?

Instead they set up this whacko tax laundering scheme? Just seems like more corporate pocket filling to me, an idiot with no business knowledge.

replies(4): >>45775371 #>>45775510 #>>45775523 #>>45777104 #
1. brookst ◴[] No.45775523[source]
It’s called seeding the market. If they can accelerate the growth of potential customers, it will be more profitable than just increasing production to serve existing customers.

Think of exponential growth — would you rather increase the base or the exponent?