←back to thread

283 points walterbell | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
stevefan1999 ◴[] No.45768818[source]
Legendary Chip Architect, Jim Keller, Says AMD ‘Stupidly Cancelled’ K12 ARM CPU Project After He Left The Company: https://wccftech.com/legendary-chip-architect-jim-keller-say...

Could be a revival but for different purposes

replies(7): >>45769959 #>>45770585 #>>45771421 #>>45772011 #>>45772565 #>>45772778 #>>45773850 #
high_na_euv ◴[] No.45769959[source]
Funny how some of his projects got cancelled like K12 at AMD or Royal Core at INTC and people always act like that was terrible decision, yet AMD is up like 100x on stock market and INTC... times gonna tell
replies(4): >>45770095 #>>45770287 #>>45771119 #>>45771786 #
StopDisinfo910 ◴[] No.45771119[source]
Seems completely uncorrelated with what is discussed especially considering Intel didn’t enter the ARM market either.

Would make much more sense to compare with Qualcomm trajectory here as they dominate the high end ARM SoC market.

Basically AMD missed the opportunity to be first mover on a market which is now huge with a project Apple proved to be viable three years after the planned AMD release. Any way you look at it, it seems like a major miss.

The fact that other good decisions in other segments were made at the same time doesn’t change that.

replies(9): >>45771185 #>>45771221 #>>45771239 #>>45771351 #>>45771611 #>>45771841 #>>45772208 #>>45772417 #>>45774680 #
1. toast0 ◴[] No.45774680[source]
If AMD released a desktop class ARM processor at that time, what software would it have run?

Apple had already switched cpus in Macs twice, it's not surprising that they could do it again, but would they have switched from Intel x86 to AMD ARM when they never used any AMD x86? Seems unlikely.

Focusing on a product that would sell on day one rather than one that would need years to build sales makes sense for a company that was struggling for relevance and continued operations.

replies(1): >>45776772 #
2. ternaryoperator ◴[] No.45776772[source]
Windows and Microsoft apps run on ARM on multiple Surface models.
replies(2): >>45779314 #>>45780471 #
3. toast0 ◴[] No.45779314[source]
In 2017, Windows on ARM was pretty bad, Windows RT not Windows 10 that had been released for x86 in 2015. I know RT started with only support for Store apps, but I don't know when it allowed native apps. x86 emulation wasn't present in RT either.

Today? Sure, they could probably sell some arm cpus; in 2017, doesn't seem likely.

4. prmoustache ◴[] No.45780471[source]
Do the typical windows user run only Microsoft Apps?

I think you can get 95% of compatibility but the 5% of apps not running, even though they might be used once every full moon and there are alternatives, might be seen as a major blocker for a potential customer if he can still buy another computer with 100% compatibility.