←back to thread

498 points azhenley | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
nixpulvis ◴[] No.45771961[source]
I try to keep deeper mutation to where it belongs, but I'll admit to shadowing variables pretty often.

If I have a `result` and I need to post-process it. I'm generally much happier doing `result = result.process()` rather than having something like `preresult`. Works nicely in cases where you end up moving it into a condition, or commenting it out to test an assumption while developing. If there's an obvious name for the intermediate result, I'll give it that, but I'm not over here naming things `result_without_processing`. You can read the code.

replies(5): >>45772035 #>>45772551 #>>45773468 #>>45775029 #>>45776914 #
furyofantares ◴[] No.45772035[source]
You're using really generic terms which I have to think is mostly because you're talking about it in the abstract. In most scenarios I find there are obvious non-generic names I can use for each step of a calculation.
replies(2): >>45772164 #>>45773979 #
1. eugenekolo ◴[] No.45773979[source]
I disagree you'd find "obvious" non-generic names easily. After all, "naming" is one of the hardest things in computer science.