←back to thread

How OpenAI uses complex and circular deals to fuel its multibillion-dollar rise

(www.nytimes.com)
387 points reaperducer | 1 comments | 31 Oct 25 13:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
SubiculumCode ◴[31 Oct 25 14:14 UTC] No.45772210[source]▶
Given that AI is a national security matter now, I'd expect the U.S.A to step in and rescue certain companies in the event of a crash. However, I'd give higher chances to NVIDIA than OpenAI. Weights are easily transferrable and the expertise is in the engineers, but ability to continue making advanced chips is not as easily transferred.
replies(4): >>45772241 #>>45772328 #>>45772343 #>>45772651 #
philipwhiuk ◴[31 Oct 25 14:27 UTC] No.45772328[source]▶
If they're too-important-to-fail they're too important not to be broken up or nationalised.
replies(3): >>45772693 #>>45773573 #>>45774853 #
1. jimbokun ◴[31 Oct 25 14:59 UTC] No.45772693[source]▶
While that is a sensible opinion the 2008 crash showed that it is not the opinion of decision makers in the US.