←back to thread

231 points ryanvogel | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.305s | source
Show context
thepaulmcbride ◴[] No.45769197[source]
I want to like this so bad, but the free tier changes still haunt me. I ran a little hobby project for a while on it that helped junior developers find jobs. The work needed to switch from PlanetScale ultimately meant I just canned the project.

Fairly or not, when I see PlanetScale, that’s what I think of.

Seeing the CEO on here defending it as if they nailed the execution of it doesn’t help either.

replies(2): >>45769892 #>>45771823 #
lopitoff ◴[] No.45769892[source]
I want to like it too.

Though, I wonder with any cloud provider of databases: why?

You’re basically giving your data to a 3rd-party to have access to and to be reliant on.

You have a backup of your source, but I bet many don’t have local non-cloud backups of their databases, maybe because it’s too much data to do easily, and everyone assumes the provider’s backups will suffice. This is a main reason I think that more recognized cloud brands like AWS and Azure are used.

replies(1): >>45771807 #
1. port11 ◴[] No.45771807[source]
We've paid for Scaleway's managed Postgres for almost 4 years at my previous startup. Small businesses don't always want to be managing a database.