←back to thread

283 points walterbell | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wmf ◴[] No.45768579[source]
I don't see why Sound Wave would have any advantage, even efficiency, over a similar Zen 5/6 design. Microsoft must really want ARM if they're having this chip made.
replies(2): >>45768654 #>>45769156 #
DeathArrow ◴[] No.45769156[source]
They did countless attempts to use ARM but all failed. Consumers didn't care because they couldn't run their software. Microsoft won't solve the problem until they will provide a way to run all relevant software on ARM.
replies(3): >>45769266 #>>45769404 #>>45769562 #
1. debugnik ◴[] No.45769266[source]
Microsoft already designed a modified ARM ABI [1] compatible with emulated X86-64 just for this transition. But it's a Windows 11 feature. I wonder if the refusal of many of us to switch from Windows 10 is part of the reason why they're still idling on an ARM strategy.

[1]: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/arm/arm64ec-abi

replies(1): >>45769844 #
2. p_l ◴[] No.45769844[source]
Part of the issue was incomplete amd64 emulation on windows which is why several MS products continued to ship 32bit - because while they might recompile their software for ARM, business users had binary-only extensions that they expected to continue using.