←back to thread

202 points akersten | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ipython ◴[] No.45767903[source]
My concern is that we will end up in a state of perpetual government "shutdown". The republicans, instead of reopening the entire government, will simply choose agencies to fund in order to keep the pain felt by the American people just low enough so they don't get fired (ala office space).

Once that happens, Congress has basically iced itself out. Oversight from unfriendly government agencies? No worries, they're shut down because they're unpaid. And clearly this demonstrates the executive needs more power, since Congress is completely frozen. Finally, the Supreme Court is no longer an issue either, since that's not funded either.

Someone tell me why this couldn't happen.

replies(15): >>45767921 #>>45767930 #>>45767964 #>>45768038 #>>45768054 #>>45768058 #>>45768067 #>>45768110 #>>45768248 #>>45768276 #>>45768281 #>>45768283 #>>45768674 #>>45768884 #>>45775389 #
pfooti ◴[] No.45768054[source]
Yeah, I think the actual underpinning support that broke this time is recission. In the past, of congress passed a budget with money for the some department or line item, that money would be spent. Now the president has claimed that he doesn't have to spend money he had been directed to spend by finding bills, and (importantly) the supreme court has upheld this stance.

This means that there is no longer the ability to negotiate a budget in good faith. The Dems can fight for more health care funding (or whatever) and the compromise can happen, and then the president can just say "sike!" And not do it.

And, political leanings aside, this president has shown that he will indeed break any agreement he decides to, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to negotiate. So I'm thinking this shutdown lasts a Long time.

replies(4): >>45768087 #>>45768269 #>>45768331 #>>45770971 #
bee_rider ◴[] No.45768087[source]
Yeah, that seems like a pretty major problem. It isn’t even clear really how negotiations should start, without any ability to make binding deals.
replies(1): >>45768153 #
mindslight ◴[] No.45768153[source]
Impeachment. Negotiations should start with impeachment. The President is not faithfully executing the laws passed by Congress, and the Supplicating Council has decreed that the only remedy is impeachment. It's time to impeach and convict.
replies(3): >>45768367 #>>45768545 #>>45772973 #
aidenn0 ◴[] No.45768545[source]
When about half of congress is more okay with the executive collecting power than with impeaching the executive, that threat is meaningless.
replies(2): >>45768650 #>>45770888 #
1. mindslight ◴[] No.45768650{3}[source]
Well yes, the follow up to my point is that every member of Congress who is not currently supporting impeachment/conviction is complicit in this abject failure of governance.

Congress has had problems for decades (thanks to Newt and the childish boomers), which is what has been accreting so much power in the Presidency to begin with. But there is still time to pull up by Congress reasserting its authority as an institution, and that time is now.