←back to thread

202 points akersten | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.412s | source
Show context
zermelo ◴[] No.45767951[source]
To most of the commentators saying "why work when you're not getting paid", please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't federal employees not paid during a government shutdown getting retroactive pay once funding has been restored?
replies(15): >>45767970 #>>45767979 #>>45767995 #>>45767996 #>>45767997 #>>45768009 #>>45768015 #>>45768016 #>>45768068 #>>45768173 #>>45768302 #>>45768325 #>>45768369 #>>45769005 #>>45778563 #
bee_rider ◴[] No.45768068[source]
Could be wrong, but IIRC congress has to explicitly approve the back pay. So, who knows if it’ll happen…
replies(1): >>45768244 #
zermelo ◴[] No.45768244[source]
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/24

Passed by Congress in January 2019 and signed by Trump. " Employees furloughed as a result of a lapse in appropriations shall be compensated for the period of the lapse on the earliest date possible after the lapse ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates. "

replies(2): >>45768362 #>>45768390 #
1. eszed ◴[] No.45768390[source]
"Furloughed" is the key term, there. Have they been?
replies(1): >>45768479 #
2. zermelo ◴[] No.45768479[source]
My understanding:

* excepted (essential) employees (including ATCs) are required to work, are not getting paid, but will be paid back for their work when Congress passes a new appropriations bill

* furloughed (non-essential) employees are told not to work, are not getting paid, but will be paid back under GEFTA once the shutdown ends, without any new law.

To be clear, I'm trying to state the facts, not my opinions.