←back to thread

202 points akersten | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.431s | source
Show context
johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45767803[source]
The things that are and aren’t considered essential enough to fund during a government shutdown are insane. Is this enshrined in a statute somewhere? Feels like adding air traffic controllers to that list should be a no-brainer (and broadly politically popular).
replies(6): >>45767816 #>>45767839 #>>45767846 #>>45767847 #>>45767873 #>>45767956 #
gruez ◴[] No.45767839[source]
>Is this enshrined in a statute somewhere? Feels like adding air traffic controllers to that list should be a no-brainer (and broadly politically popular).

They are considered essential. That means they have to work, but not be paid.

https://time.com/7329683/government-shutdown-flight-delays-c...

replies(3): >>45767868 #>>45768031 #>>45768427 #
shadowgovt ◴[] No.45768031[source]
So what happens if they don't show up? Are they at risk of jail or at risk of being fired and replaced by the new recruit, Michael McDoesnt-Exist (https://www.aviationtoday.com/2025/07/25/americas-atc-meltdo...)?
replies(2): >>45768085 #>>45768426 #
1. johncolanduoni ◴[] No.45768085[source]
I could imagine some sort of loss of seniority or pay level, even if they’d hire them right back because we already have an ATC shortage.
replies(1): >>45768130 #
2. shadowgovt ◴[] No.45768130[source]
Well, that's certainly a negotiation standpoint the government can start from.

... But they're hurting for recruits in a big way so even at their size their negotiating position isn't as strong as they might want.